Musical Echolalia
The purpose of this blog is to disseminate information related to music and autism, echolalia, autism and sensory integration, from theoretical, historical, and cultural perspectives in order to best develop an rationale for the function of musical echolalia and non-verbal children with autism.
Sunday, February 9, 2014
Symposium Follow-up
Thank you for attending the Symposium at Berklee last year! Here is some feedback from an attendee http://missingpiecesproject.wordpress.com/2013/02/
Saturday, January 12, 2013
Symposium Music Therapy and Autism
Perspectives on Music
Therapy and Autism
Free One-Day Symposium
February 12, 2013
9:00am-3:30pm
Berklee College of Music
David Friend Recital Hall
921 Boylston Street
Boston, MA 01915
Adult family member, allies,
and professionals are invited to attend this free one day symposium on music
therapy and autism. Local and
international music therapists and researchers will share perspectives on how
music therapy plays a role in the lives of individuals with autism. Key speakers will include Dr. Pamela Heaton,
PhD from Goldsmiths College, University of London; Dr. Catherine Wan, PhD from
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School; and Dr. Krystal
Demaine, PhD, MT-BC from Lesley University.
The day will include lunch, roundtable discussions, and a concert by the
Boston Higashi School Jazz Band. The New
England Chapter of Autism Speaks and the Music Therapy Department at Berklee
College of Music sponsor this free event.
Monday, December 17, 2012
Research Collaborations in Music Therapy
I was invited to give a talk to the Massachusetts Music Therapy Alliance (MMTA) in Weston MA on December 8, 2012. The theme of all MMTA talks this year is Collaboration. In my talk, I spoke about collaboration in music therapy research.
I large point I made in my talk was on the importance of recognizing expertise in music therapy and in other fields of practice. As individuals (music therapists), we cannot be expected to excel at all that we do. To be able to reach out to others and collaborate in our work is a unique and valid element for good practice. When it comes to research, there are multiple layers involved in producing meaningful outcomes. There is a need for a team of people who can work together to produce the best possible research related to the work at hand. As music therapists we have special skills in understanding musical concepts, individual (participants) needs, behavioral / psychological normality, use of space/ time, and session structure. With all of these areas of skill in music therapy, the potential for great contributions to research is unbounding. Music therapists do however rely on other experts (non-music therapists) to contribute to the analysis, writing, testing measures, involved in the research process.
When reviewing the literature in the field I have found that, the majority of music therapists work with other music therapists in order to produce research. Furthermore, much of that research is anecdotal and includes small samples and case studies. I think that with collaborations with experts outside of the field of music therapy more expansive and meaningful contributions can be made to the literature. I don't mean to say that research produced solely by music therapists isn't meaningful, however I would like to indicate the potential of reaching broader audiences and scientific communities through collaborative research.
From conversations with other music therapists, it seems that many clinicians are interested in participating in research, but don't know where to begin. I think that if music therapists reached beyond music therapy lines that research could be produced more quickly and scientifically. Someitmes we work better when we are encouraged and supported by others in our process. We all have so much to contribute to the world and we don't need to do it all alone.
A link to my presentation has been posted on the MMTA page http://massmusictherapy.org/?page_id=843
Please feel free to take a peek at the presentation. Perhaps I will further develop this presentation for other forums.
Enjoy!
I large point I made in my talk was on the importance of recognizing expertise in music therapy and in other fields of practice. As individuals (music therapists), we cannot be expected to excel at all that we do. To be able to reach out to others and collaborate in our work is a unique and valid element for good practice. When it comes to research, there are multiple layers involved in producing meaningful outcomes. There is a need for a team of people who can work together to produce the best possible research related to the work at hand. As music therapists we have special skills in understanding musical concepts, individual (participants) needs, behavioral / psychological normality, use of space/ time, and session structure. With all of these areas of skill in music therapy, the potential for great contributions to research is unbounding. Music therapists do however rely on other experts (non-music therapists) to contribute to the analysis, writing, testing measures, involved in the research process.
When reviewing the literature in the field I have found that, the majority of music therapists work with other music therapists in order to produce research. Furthermore, much of that research is anecdotal and includes small samples and case studies. I think that with collaborations with experts outside of the field of music therapy more expansive and meaningful contributions can be made to the literature. I don't mean to say that research produced solely by music therapists isn't meaningful, however I would like to indicate the potential of reaching broader audiences and scientific communities through collaborative research.
From conversations with other music therapists, it seems that many clinicians are interested in participating in research, but don't know where to begin. I think that if music therapists reached beyond music therapy lines that research could be produced more quickly and scientifically. Someitmes we work better when we are encouraged and supported by others in our process. We all have so much to contribute to the world and we don't need to do it all alone.
A link to my presentation has been posted on the MMTA page http://massmusictherapy.org/?page_id=843
Please feel free to take a peek at the presentation. Perhaps I will further develop this presentation for other forums.
Enjoy!
Tuesday, November 27, 2012
Conference Report
I recently wrote a report on my the Northeast Music Cognition Group Meeting held at Boston University on November 17, 2012. The report has been posted on the Music Therapy Research Blog "bringing current research to music therapy clinicians".
Here is the link to the report: http://www.musictherapyresearchblog.com/?p=1399
Here is the link to the report: http://www.musictherapyresearchblog.com/?p=1399
Monday, November 26, 2012
AMTA and NEMCOG (applied science and research)
I recently presented my research on Musical Echolalia and Non-Verbal
Children with Autism at two different venues.
On October 13, 2012 I presented a poster of my topic at the American
Music Therapy Association National (AMTA) Conference in St. Charles,
Illinois. On November 17, 2012 I
presented an eight-minute talk of the same topic at the North East Music
Cognition Group (NEMCOG) at Boston University in Boston, Massachusetts. Just to note, I am writing a guest article on
the NEMCOG meeting for the “Music Therapy Research Blog,” and will provide a
link to my article here once it is published.
While I
presented the same topic at each venue, the remarks and inquires I received
from the conference attendees were both divergent and unique. It was
interesting for me to reflect upon the two experiences and realize the
different lenses in which researchers at NEMCOG and clinicians at the AMTA conference viewed the research. Attendees of the AMTA conference is mainly comprised of music therapy professionals and students while the NEMCOG meeting is primarily researchers. Personally, I consider myself as a researcher and
clinician with greater depth of history as a clinician.
The main
differences that I noticed among the comments from music therapists at the AMTA
conference were that they hoped to see stronger clinical outcomes in my current research. I explained that my
initial findings were lead to the need for a protocol that tests the clinical
implications of musical echolalia. While
I explained that my findings indicated social outcomes the music therapists
wanted to see how the findings could be used in a traditional clinical
setting.
On the
other side of the coin, the researchers at the NEMCOG meeting commented positively at the
novelty of my findings and said that the outcomes spoke clearly to the uniqueness of imitation and music among children with autism, and in a way presented a strong case against the mirror neuron
theory. Many of the comments of the researchers
were steeped in topic specific answers and related to the current findings in
the field. The questions that the
researchers asked me were specific in their relation to the definition of
imitation and how I defined it specific to my work.
It seemed
that the main differences among the response of my two presentations were that
the music therapists were looking for more clinical depth and had a canvas of
questions related to the breadth of the work, while the researchers at NEMCOG
were impressed with the novel findings and asked questions that were very
scientific in nature. Philosophically
speaking, these questions presented at the two meetings could all be the same
with just a different dialect to express the inquiry. In a way I believe that music therapists are
researchers, while researches also delve into applied work; ultimately, I
believe there is a common mission between the two roles. One
common thread between both meetings asked when and where the work would be published. I am glad that this question was raised because
it encourages me to move forward and produce this work more widely to the
public.
Tuesday, September 4, 2012
American Chinese Medical Exchange: Autism
Conference Proceedings
Biomedical Advances of Autism 2012
American Chinese Medical Exchange Society
On August 26, 2012 the American Chinese Medical Exchange
Society www.acmes.net in collaboration with
McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School hosted a one-day forum entitled Biomedical Advances of Autism 2012. This event introduced a rich agenda of
speakers, comprised mainly of researchers and medical doctors who practice
traditional western and traditional Chinese medicine with individuals who have
autism.
I found this conference to be both thought provoking and
inspiring. I attended the
conference with friend Dr. Jane
Richardson, ART-BC, who is an art therapist and colleague at Lesley
University. Jane and I traveled to Beijing, China with in 2009, where
we were invited to both present our work at the
International Creative Arts Therapy Conference. In result of our experience in China, we have a co-written book chapter, which will appear in an edited
book to arrive later this year.
The current conference, Biomedical Advances of
Autism 2012, allowed the opportunity for the audience and its speakers to consider
scientific and real basis for working with children with autism, through the very
ancient and very holistic lense of traditional Chinese medicine. The book Chapter that mentioned that Jane and I have
collaborated on exemplifies this view in its relation to the expressive /
creative arts therapies – a multi-sensory whole body engagement for the child
with autism.
The keynote speaker at the current conference was Dr. Martha Herbert
who shared her new book, “Autism Revolution.”
In her keynote talk Herbert spoke of the timeliness of the conference
and the importance of listening / working with / examining the whole child – a
view that Traditional Chinese Medicine has long employed. With respect to traditional Chinese medicine
– considering the meridians and the five element theory in relation to the many
aspects of life – and how the child with autism operates may seem foreign to
many, however, it is an ancient practice that has been used for centuries. Herbert’s
talk seemed to consider the treatemetn of autism with a holistic view –
Herbert considered neurology while also looking
at the impact of stress, biology, and the environment upon the child.
What stood out the most to me was when Herbert began to note the sharp rise in the autism
diagnosis. She suggested that individuals with autism may be trying to tell the
work something – like “the canary in the cole mine,” she said…. “should autism
be the world telling us about the human race?”
I think that regardless of what happens with individuals
with autism, that it is important to listen with heart, hands, voice, and ears –
engage the whole body and listen with the whole body – as we may not all speak
or understand the same language, we might as well be open to exploring other
options if we want to learn form one another…
There
is something to be said for exploring traditional Chinese medicine for
children whit autism. There is published literature on the use of
acupuncture, traditional Chinese herbs, and traditional Chinese
movement practices (tai chi, qi gong) in helping children with autism
manage some difficulties - yet more needs to be explored. As a music
therapist and expressive arts therapist - I see that there is a
correlation between Chinese medicine and the arts - and can quickly
identify helping properties for the child with autism. I look forward
to reading new literature on this topic and writing and exploring such
applications in my own work.
Thank you for the American Chinese Medical Exchange Society for hosting such a wonderful event!
Sunday, September 2, 2012
Conference Preceedings: Perspectives from the Jouney / The Autism Forum at the Boston Higashi School
On April 26th, 2012 the Higashi School of Boston held
a one day Autism Forum at the Hilton Boston / Dedham entitled “Perspectives
from the Journey.” The forum hosted four
presenters who each shared an hour-long talk on their perspective of either being
a person with autism, of researching autism, and / or researching “hot” topics
on or related to autism. Each talk at
this conference, presented itself a master class of thought provoking
information from leading experts.
The presenters
included: Dr. Temple Grandin, Dr.
Margaret Bauman, Dr. Stephen Shore, and Mr. Seth Mnookin.
After the morning registration, a welcoming breakfast buffet,
and opening remarks from the principle of the Higashi School, the first speaker Dr. Temple Grandin was graciously
introduced.
Dr. Grandin’s talk
was entitled, “Autism in My Sensory Based
World.” According to the
introduction by the principle of the Higashi School, Temple Grandin, PhD, is
known as “the most famous person with autism.”
Grandin has published several books, been a strong advocate for autism,
has been portrayed in film, and has been called upon to consult on many
occasions. In her talk Grandin shared
several stories of her life as a person with autism, the schools she attended
(Beaver Country Day School), her sensory processes (the famed Squeeze Machine),
her ability to shift attention, and tune into specific stimuli. She referenced current literature in the
field, shared images of her young life, shared images of her current MRI, and
research images on the brains of others with autism.
In the talk Grandin focused on information processing –that
information is often “coming in to fast” for the person with autism to process,
causing sensory abnormalities and difficulty with processing information. Grandin also spoke to the many uniquie
talents for individuals wit autism, and that it is important to allow these
talents to be contributed to society.
She spoke primarily of individuals with Aspergers syndrome, mainily the
verbal folks. She spoke of the importance
of getting “these folks / kids” involved in social activities - music groups,
drama groups – to encourage socialization with others while doing a pleasurable
activity. She noted the heterogeneity
of autism, which reminded me that TAKING A SENSORY PROFILE IS SOOOO IMPORTANT!
For readers interested in Grandin’s perspective, I highly
recommend Grandin’s Ted Talk http://www.ted.com/talks/temple_grandin_the_world_needs_all_kinds_of_minds.html
The second speaker
to be introduced was pediatric neurologist Dr. Margaret Bauman. Dr.
Bauman is a leading researcher in the investigation of the neurobiology of
autism. In her talk Dr. Bauman spoke to
the forthcoming DSM-V diagnostic criteria for autism changes (slated for May
2013). These proposed changes will
include Asperger’s as part of ASD and narrow the three criteria to two criteria
(1. Communication and social limitations and 2. Restrictive and repetitive behaviors). There has been a lot of two-sided discussion
on these proposed changes on how it might impact the autistic community. Bauman spoke to genetic phenotypes and
subtypes - the role of assessing
subtypes, and the need to develop an assessment tool for such criteria to
occur. Because of the heterogeneity of
the disorder, Bauman explained, “subtypes are important to consider.”
After a lovely lunch and a performance by the Boston Higashi
School Jazz Band, the third speaker was announced.
The third speaker
was Mr.
Seth Mnookin, who presented a talk entitled “Panic Virus: A True Story of Medicine, Science and Fear.” Mr. Mnookin is an author who has written
a book on vaccines and autism called, The
Panic Virus: The True Story Behind the Vaccine-Autism Controversy. Mr. Mnookin, was very well spoken and well
researched in his topic. He had attended
conferences, spoken to parents, and reviewed literature on the topic of autism
and vaccines. Mnooken noted in his talk
that “biggest impact of the autism – vaccine debate has been how it has divided
the autism community.”
The fourth and final
speaker was Dr. Stephen Shore, who gave a talk entitled “Life on and
Slightly to the Right of the Autism Spectrum.”
Like Grandin, Shore is also an adult person with ASD, and also
considered high functioning. Shore told
stories of his experiences with perceptual processing, managing relationships,
the role of his parents in his early treatment, and his current life. He referenced such work as the Miller Method,
Lovaas ABA therapy, Floortime (Greenspan), Daily Life Therapy (Higashi), and
curriculum for Universal Design. Shore
in particular spoke about his experience with music. Please see my previous post on Shore’s book http://musicalecholalia.blogspot.com/2012/07/beyond-wall-by-stephen-shore.html
Shore noted that “music is good for every body” and that
“what is good for people with autism is good for everyone.”
All in all, the Higashi School hosted an incredible one-day
event that surely stirred interest in students, educators, therapists, administrators,
parents, and researchers alike. It was a
true gathering of pioneers in the field in a real master class like forum.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)